Category Archives: fiction

And Then There Were None

Another revisit from my college days! And Then There Were None is my favorite Agatha Christie mystery that I’ve read so far.

As I’ve mentioned before, I have a thing about settings that greatly influence the circumstances of plot. Much like other novels and forms of entertainment I’ve written about here, like The Haunting of Hill House, The Shining, and Evil Under the Sun (also by Agatha Christie), setting plays a crucial role in how the plot unfolds.

The ten main characters are on an island, having been offered jobs or holidays or various other enticements to get them out to the island. One by one, they start ending up murdered. The murderer must be on the island.

The story goes on from there.

I still love how this book unfolds. There’s a crushing sense of inevitability and claustrophobia. I still love the motivation for the murders that we do, eventually, get from the story. It’s still the first mystery I recommend if someone asks me where to start with mysteries.

As you may or may not be aware, the original title of And Then There Were None was “Ten Little N*ggers” or “Ten Little Indians.” The language, which was not as offensive in England when the book was published, was changed for obvious reasons in the United States.

Anyway, there’s a real minstrel song/poem that goes with each “title.” The poem has changed through the years too, at least the one printed in the book. This is the current version, called “Ten Little Soldier Boys.”

Ten little Soldier Boys went out to dine;
One choked his little self and then there were nine.

Nine little Soldier Boys sat up very late;
One overslept himself and then there were eight.

Eight little Soldier Boys travelling in Devon;
One said he’d stay there and then there were seven.

Seven little Soldier Boys chopping up sticks;
One chopped himself in halves and then there were six.

Six little Soldier Boys playing with a hive;
A bumblebee stung one and then there were five.

Five little Soldier Boys going through a door;
One stubbed his toe and then there were four.

Four little Soldier Boys going out to sea;
A red herring swallowed one and then there were three.

Three little Soldier Boys walking in the zoo;
A big bear hugged one and then there were two.

Two little Soldier Boys sitting in the sun;
One got frizzled up and then there was one.

One little Soldier Boy left all alone;
He went and hanged himself, and then there were none.

…This is the mystery, guys. If you’re going to read just one in your whole life, this is it.

Origin

Robert Langdon returns in another over the top, trashy thriller that I, of course, devoured voraciously in a frenzy of excited joy.

Dan Brown writes my favorite far fetched works featuring a self-inserted nerd, and he didn’t disappoint in Origin!

Edmond Kirsch, Langdon’s former student, now billionaire businessman, is giving a presentation to an audience about the future of the human race (he’s made a revolutionary discovery) when he’s murdered in front of everyone. The mystery of who ordered the murder and why unravels as Langdon, his new acquaintance Ambra, and Winston – Kirsch’s version of Tony Stark’s Jarvis – rush to solve the murder and find out what Kirsch’s big discovery was.

I really liked the ending to this one, guys.

As usual, the novel was set in Europe and I am still dying to go to all of Europe, so this book continued that tradition. One of the quests it added to my list was Sagrada Familia in Spain. It looks so cool and so beautiful!

Anyway, I liked Origin. I like Robert Langdon, basically because he is a smart nerd who solves mysteries with his deep ocean of knowledge about stuff. I know that there are three films based on these novels starring Tom Hanks, but can I tell you that I pictured Robert Langdon like Tom Hanks long before Hollywood did? True story.

I don’t follow Dan Brown obsessively and I don’t know if they’re done with the movies, but as always, I was sent to Europe with a host I like for a thrilling ride. Worth it!

The Girl Who Takes an Eye for an Eye

The latest book in the Lisbeth Salander series is the second by David Lagercrantz and was not my favorite. My favorite remains the first story, but I’m starting to worry that we’re going to see a sharp drop in quality the farther out we get from Stieg Larsson’s death.

We do learn some interesting information about Lisbeth’s past, and we do watch her (from prison for her activities in the previous book) and Mikael Blomkvist solve a mystery and a crime.

There are basically two stories going on. One is about Lisbeth and the system she was brought up in after her abuse. This involves a complex social project called “The Registry” which sounded super sketchy and had something to do with separating gifted twins. Lisbeth and Blomkvist figure out that a wealthy businessman Leo Manneheimer is not actually Leo Manheimmer and the story that entails.

The other story is about a prisoner Lisbeth is trying to protect from another violent prisoner. Lisbeth is convinced the prisoner she is protecting doesn’t belong in prison, and there’s a mystery being solved there as well.

It was entertaining enough. It just wasn’t as good the previous installments.

The pacing was off, compared to previous novels, and Salander wasn’t actually in a lot of the book. Plus she was in prison a lot of the time. Langercrantz spent a lot of time on characters he created for the book, which I guess is ok, but not really why I read them.

I hope the next installment is better.

Rebecca

Like American Gods and Neverwhere, Daphne du Maurier’s Rebecca was a book I’d read a decade before. Earlier, actually.

The first time I read Rebecca was for English class as a summer reading book going into high school, so I was 14 at the time. My mom convinced me to read it because there was an Alfred Hitchcock film to accompany it, starring Joan Fontaine, and I loved Hitch. Still do. Anyway, I watched the movie, then read the book.

Hitchcock’s ability to stay true to the source material in the film was pretty phenomenal. The source material is also something I came to know and love in time.

It opens, “Last night I dreamt I went to Manderley again.”

We meet the never named narrator, who is in her early twenties with no family, working as a traveling companion for the insufferable Mrs. VanHopper in Monte Carlo. While Mrs. VanHopper recovers from the flu, the narrator meets and (much to her surprise) is courted by George Fortescue Maximilian ‘Maxim’ de Winter, a wealthy English widower. He is somewhat older than her, at 42, but he enjoys her company so much in Monte Carlo that he asks her to marry him and after the trip they return to his English country estate, Manderley.

At Manderley we meet the staff and Mrs. Danvers, the housekeeper, who was quite devoted to Maxim’s first wife, Rebecca. Rebecca seems to have been perfect in every way. The second Mrs. de Winter (again, we never learn her first name and she is only ever referred to as Mrs. de Winter, the second Mrs. de Winter, or a pet name by Maxim) is haunted by Rebecca, as nobody has ever done anything to change the habits she had in the house when she was alive. She was adored by neighbors, friends, and society. The narrator becomes more and more convinced her husband is still pining for Rebecca.

As the narrator matures and her antagonistic relationship with the devoted Mrs. Danvers boils over, she slowly uncovers the true nature of her relationship with her husband, his relationship with Rebecca, and learns all about Rebecca herself.

Rebecca is described as a romantic suspense novel but it isn’t romantic the way we think of romance novels. It’s more of a Gothic novel, so don’t let the romantic part turn you off.

I’ve read a number of du Maurier’s books and short stories now, and while I haven’t read all of them, I would say it’s safe to assume that Rebecca is du Maurier at her best, the pinnacle of all that is enchanting about her work: the atmosphere, the secrets, the suspense, the dual nature of the characters’ reality. It’s a page turner in its own dark, brooding way.

This was a revisited book, but I’ve seen the movie 100 times because I love it. I hadn’t read the whole book in awhile, although I had gone back to look at pieces of it here and there, and enjoyed it again, tremendously. Rebecca remains one of my favorite books of all time.

Neverwhere

Neverwhere was the other of Neil Gaiman’s books I revisited in 2018. It remains my favorite Gaiman book, and unlike American Gods, I remembered most of it.

What’s interesting about Neverwhere and American Gods is that I revisited American Gods because they did a TV adaptation I watched. Gaiman wrote Neverwhere as a companion novel to the TV series on BBC that he co-wrote. I haven’t seen the TV version of Neverwhere, but supposedly it is almost exactly the same. I am determined to find it and watch it eventually.

In Neverwhere, a Scottish man living in London one night stumbles upon an injured girl named Door and chooses to help her in spite of the fact that his fiance wanted to leave her there to possibly die. After this encounter, Richard finds himself quickly fading from his own life. His job is no longer his, his workmates no longer remember him, and his own fiance no longer knows who he is (although, considering how she wanted to leave a girl to die in the street, you dodged a bullet there, Richard).

Richard becomes visible only to the inhabitants of “London Below,” a magical, parallel realm that is beneath the sewers underground and invisible to inhabitants of “London Above.” It’s a parallel realm but with some interesting differences. For example, in London Below, landmarks from London Above take on different meanings. For example, the Angel, Islington is an actual angel.

Richard adventures through London Below with Door, the Marquis de Carabas, Hunter, and various others. Door is on a quest for Islington, who wants a key kept by the Black Friars and promises to help discover who murdered her entire family in exchange for the key.  They are, of course, being chased by two brutal and not quite human assassins, Mr. Croup and Mr. Vandemar.

I enjoyed Neverwhere a lot. The world building is fun, and of all Gaiman’s books, I find this one to have the most interesting cast of characters and the most interesting story. Many of Gaiman’s works have elements of mythology. This is no different, and it features quite prominently throughout the book. The conclusion of the books is also quite satisfying, which is the icing on the cake. Nothing is better than a great ending to a book you really enjoyed.

American Gods

Neil Gaiman’s American Gods is a book I first read at the recommendation of a friend in 2007. I revisited it because the TV adaptation started airing in 2017.

Let’s just say they are two very different things, although since I think of them that way, I have no preference for one over the other.

I enjoyed revisiting the book. One of the arguments against Gaiman that I’ve seen is basically that he tells different variations of the same story over and over – basically a (white) guy becomes the hero in a secret world not visible to most of the rest of the population.

This story doesn’t bother me, and I tend to like the way Gaiman tells it.

Shadow Moon was THISCLOSE to getting out of prison and home to his wife when he’s released three days early. His wife and best friend die in a car accident. Later, Shadow finds out his wife was cheating on him with his best friend. I won’t retell the whole story here but basically this revelation sets Shadow adrift and pushes him into the employment of Mr. Wednesday as his “bodyguard.”

Ultimately, Shadow finds himself caught up in battle between the Old Gods – the gods we studied as part of our high school history and English classes – and the New Gods – the gods of money, media, and globalization.

I feel like I somehow missed a lot of the book when I read it in college, so it was sort of like discovering a new book all over again. I had completely forgotten large portions, and some of the portions were new, because the audiobook was the 10th anniversary edition with the author’s preferred text which included an additional 12,000 words and was performed by a full cast. It was very well done and I thoroughly enjoyed rediscovering it.

Criticism of Gaiman as a guy who tells different versions of the same story over and over is somewhat valid, but I find his insight into America uniquely interesting in this book. As someone who is now 10-12 years older than I was when I read it the first time, and has paid a lot more attention to the country I grew up in over those years, Gaiman’s take on the United States as a “bad place for Gods” is both the opposite of what people would think and also incredibly true.

Power belongs to the people/things men give it to. While you would think the United States of Jesusland was an excellent place for what we think of as the Christian God – it still is in many places – it’s bad in the sense that things constantly change here, with power constantly moving from one thing to the next as society and its opinions evolve. The “new gods” of money, media, globalization are hugely powerful now, but eventually their power will fade too. Maybe not entirely and maybe not in our lifetime, but they will, eventually, fade away as well. In a way, it’s already starting, between claims of “fake news” and a growing backlash against money in politics, and the instinct of many ordinary Americans to fight against sending jobs overseas.

As the United States continues to look for itself and continues to try to find itself, things will continue to change. As Gaiman points out, the United States is the only place in the world that doesn’t have a set definition of what it is, or necessarily even cares much.

“This is the only country in the world,” said Wednesday, into the stillness, “that worries about what it is.”

“What?”

“The rest of them know what they are. No one ever needs to go searching for the heart of Norway. Or looks for the soul of Mozambique. They know what they are.”

It’s an incredibly relevant take lately, particularly as we approach a presidential election in 2020.

American Gods remains firmly in its position of my second favorite Gaiman book. I’ve read quite a few. It was nice to revisit, and I’m sure I will revisit it again.

Smoke

I read Smoke on my honeymoon and it’s the first book I read by Dan Vyleta that I found unsatisfying, but not for the reasons you would think.

The premise is really, really good.

In an alternate Victorian England those who are wicked are marked by the smoke that pours out of their bodies. The aristocracy are clean, proof of their virtue and right to rule, while the lower classes are drenched in sin and soot.

Thomas Argyle is the only son of a wayward aristocrat. Charlie Cooper is his best friend. When Thomas finds himself under the boot heel of a sadistic headboy in the treacherous halls of their elite boarding school, he and Charlie begin to question the rules of their society. Then the boys meet Livia, the daughter of a wealthy and powerful family. She leads them to a secret laboratory where they learn that smoke may not be as it seems, and together they set out to uncover the truth about their world.

I enjoyed the book. Like Vyleta’s other books that I’ve read – The Quiet Twin and The Crooked Maid – it was atmospheric, detail oriented, with interesting twists (not as interesting as the other two, but still good) and somehow slow but well paced.

I could predict some of the twists, which is why I didn’t think it was as good as the first two books, but the end was good enough for me to overlook this.

That said, I found the explanation for the smoke dissatisfying. I just…didn’t like it.

However. I really liked the characters – Thomas, Charlie, and Livia – are all a lot of fun. Livia was irritating for awhile, but her mother more than makes up for this. Once Livia lightens up and asserts herself, she’s great.

The villain of the story – an older boy from a very wealthy family – is quite the villain. More animal than human once he gives in to his worst instincts, he’s real and frightening, and of course, and not so subtly showing the “virtue” of the ruling class as a lot of nonsense.

The story setting was also a lot of fun. With echos of Dickens’s own 19th century London woven through the text, Smoke isn’t my favorite of Vyleta’s books, but it was one of my favorite novels of 2018.

A Tale of Two Cities

I’ve read Charles Dickens’s A Tale of Two Cities before. In high school, sophomore year.

This would be an excellent example of a teacher you have destroying a book you read.

A Tale of Two Cities is not a book that you look to for statements about the objectification of women. It’s not a book where you talk about how the hero of the story is secretly selfish because he hopes, one day, to be remembered.

A Tale of Two Cities is a book where you talk about the redemption of human beings, and love, and symbolism, and fabulous prose. It’s a book where heroes are heroes and villains are deliciously evil.

It’s a book where, if you’re reading it in high school with an English teacher who sells herself as an intellectual but pedals pseudo-intellectual bullshit, you ignore everything your English teacher has to say and just enjoy the story.

There is something to the criticism that the characters here are a bit flat; Lucie is loving and supporting and never changes and it’s borderline cringeworthy in spots. The Marquis is evil and unabashedly enjoys it. The most developed character is easily Sydney Carton.

I love Sydney Carton. I didn’t know it in the 10th grade, but I knew this time through, that he was suffering from depression and self-medicating with alcohol, and he let his law partner get the credit for his true legal brilliance because, basically, he just didn’t care. He was selfless, and smart, and I adored him.

There was only one, gaping plot hole in this book that I either didn’t hear because I missed it while I was simultaneously doing something else, like driving (entirely possible), or because there was just one, gaping plot hole that was never explained:

How did Carton know to show up in Paris? After reading the plot summary, I guess it’s because the family was gone from London for so long? Anyway, if anyone knows for sure, I’d be glad to hear it.

If you hated A Tale of Two Cities in high school, I highly suggest revisiting it, particularly as an audiobook. It’s still wordy AF. It can still be a bit slow in spots. But I appreciated it so much more this time. In contrast to my newfound warmer feelings for Sydney Carton, were my much stronger repulsive feeling to Madame Defarge. I somehow missed the first time through exactly how evil she was. She’s great to hate. And I hated her so much more this time.

Dickens has his reputation as one of the greatest writers the English language has ever produced, and I get it. I get it now. I hope you give yourself the chance to get it, too.

The Minotaur

I took Barbara Vine’s The Minotaur out of the library. It happened to catch my eye and the blurb on the jacket sounded really interesting.

As soon as Kerstin Kvist arrives at remote, ivy-covered Lydstep Old Hall in Essex, she feels like a character in a gothic novel. A young nurse fresh out of school, Kerstin has been hired for a position with the Cosway family, residents of the Hall for generations. She is soon introduced to her “charge” John Cosway, a thirty-nine-year-old man whose strange behavior is vaguely explained by his mother and sisters as part of the madness that runs in the family.

Weeks go by at Lydstep with little to mark the passage of time beyond John’s daily walks and the amusingly provincial happenings that engross the Cosway women, and Kerstin occupies her many free hours at the Hall reading or making entries into her diary. Meanwhile, bitter wrangling among Julia Cosway and her four grown daughters becomes increasingly evident. But this is just the most obvious of the tensions that charge the old remote estate, with its sealed rooms full of mystery. Soon Kerstin will find herself in possession of knowledge she will wish she’d never attained, secrets that will propel the occupants of Lydstep Old Hall headlong into sexual obsession, betrayal, and, finally, murder.

Sounds great, right?

It was not so great. Whoever writes these blurbs does a better job than the author hyping the book. The concept was good, the execution was…meh.

None of the characters, minus the narrator, was very likable. Julia was the aging matriarch who disparaged her daughters and drugged her son, John, to control him. John probably had some kind of high functioning Asperger syndrome, or maybe schizophrenia. Ida was the oldest and, more or less, relegated to the role of housewife and caretaker of the family, doing all the cooking and cleaning. Ella and Winifred were, more or less, the same character but one – Winifred – was engaged to be married to the town vicar. Winifred was a caterer, Ella was a teacher. Both were shallow, superficial, and ended up in a sexual relationship with an “artist” who moved into town and who the narrator, Kerstin, nails as a playboy pretty much the moment she meets him. Zorah, the youngest, is a wealthy widow who flaunts money and uses it to hold power over the rest of the family. It’s revealed later why she’s so bitter, but in some ways, she’s much better than her mom and sisters, because she actually cares about her brother and tries to get him help that he needs, rather than just drug him to keep him docile.

The action proceeds much too slowly to be considered particularly interesting. I didn’t find it particularly suspenseful. The characters were so annoying and horrible to Kerstin that it was hard to tolerate – only John pronounced her name the way she asked, as “Shastin,” which was the Norwegian pronunciation, apparently – and only Zorah’s story was worth its background, and I’m convinced it’s because she wasn’t in the book a lot.

There were a lot of Gothic elements – an old, crumbling home, a curse, “romance,” etc… – but they were grossly exaggerated and a lot of them didn’t matter. Yes, there was tragedy and secrets and you did get a sense of claustrophobia, but it just wasn’t enough to make the novel worth it.

The climax of the book was also a total letdown, as well as completely infuriating and upsetting…at least to me, but I never liked bullies.

“Barbara Vine” is a pen name of Ruth Rendell, and under this pen name, she writes these “psychological thrillers.” I’ve heard a lot of good things about Barbara Vine, including from Stephen King. When I googled, I found he’d said of her, “best suspense novelist with undercurrents of horror.” I suppose her other novels must have been more effective. I started with this one. If I didn’t know that her other novels are widely admired, I’d feel no need to ever read another.

Evil Under the Sun

My annual attempt at reading “scary” stories in October actually worked out in 2017.

I actually read this book, and it was exciting because it was the first book I took out from the library in the town where I now live, so it was a big moment for me.

Anyway, Evil Under the Sun was one of Agatha Christie’s murder mysteries, one of the lesser known ones that doesn’t get much attention. This one, unlike a couple of the other lesser known ones I’ve read, was quite enjoyable.

Hercule Poirot is on holiday at a secluded beach hotel in Devon when a beautiful, flirtatious red-headed actress named Arlena is murdered. Poirot and the police go through the full investigation and questioning of witnesses and about their alibis.

In this particular case, Arlena was a well known flirt who had many affairs after her first husband died under suspicious circumstances and she remarried an honorable military man, who was in love with someone else who happened to be at the hotel. He also had a daughter who hated her step mother.

Other suspects include a young man that Arlena appeared to be having an affair with, the young man’s wife, and several other vacation goers with means and motive.

As usual, Poirot’s reasoning was flawless, and as usual, there is a piece of information the reader isn’t privy to until Poirot reveals it – in this case, a similar murder – which means the reader can’t solve the mystery but doesn’t render it unenjoyable.

I might have liked this book a lot because, as I’ve mentioned before, I have an affinity for mysteries and stories where the isolated settings dictate a lot of what is possible for the characters. This book took place at a remote beach resort, and so there were a very specific set of suspects that must have committed the crime in a very specific set of circumstance.

This was an entirely satisfying mystery and a good one for Halloween.