Tag Archives: genre: fiction

The Winter Station

The first time I noticed Jody Shields’ The Winter Station, I tagged it as a book I had to read based on the title alone. I also remember reading the synopsis and thinking it was interesting, but when I finally got around to reading the book, I must have confused it with another because it wasn’t about what I thought it was about at all.

“So what was it about?” you ask. Good question!

During the freezing cold winter of 1910 in Kharbin, a remote but major Russian controlled rail outpost in Manchuria, Northern China, the bodies of two men are found frozen in the snow outside Central Station. Because the deaths were of two Chinese men, they were not considered relevant, and the city’s chief medical officer, Baron von Budberg, was not called. There were no death certificates, the bodies were not examined, and were quickly forgotten. And then, suddenly, people are mysteriously dying at an alarming rate. Baron von Budberg is a Russian aristocrat who finds himself facing a plague that he and his colleagues are struggling to contain before it spreads to the rest of the world on the trains that come and go so frequently. Bodies are disappearing. The doctor finds himself battling Russian custom, as well as human prejudice, and the dichotomy of western medical science and his own respect for Chinese traditional medicine. In his fight, he finds himself allied with a black market mercenary, a French doctor, and a theatrical Chinese dwarf. He hides from the world in the arms of his young Chinese wife, who also has secrets.

This book sounds a lot more exciting than it is, but it isn’t a bad book. I read a lot of reviews for it after I completed it and the main complaint seemed to be this wasn’t a thriller. I guess the problem with the blurbs on the jacket of the book is that the they’re trying to get you to buy the book, not necessarily enjoy it. The blurb on this book does make it sound like it’s a quick paced race against time, and while it is a race against time, it’s not a mile a minute seat of your pants race against time. It’s an atmospheric slow burning medical drama with someone trying to do the right thing while being pulled in several different forceful directions and frustrated by bureaucracy.

I have to say, it was a bit slow but overall I enjoyed it. It took me awhile to enjoy it though. Much like my experience with Joseph Heller’s Catch 22, I was quite close to the end before fully understanding and liking the book. The protagonist, von Budberg, is a good man who is a well written, fully developed character. Some of the supporting characters could have used some fleshing out, but it wasn’t a deal breaker. There was some beautiful language in this book, but I spotted some incongruities in the writing – sometimes a character would start speaking that I wasn’t even aware was in the room. Again, not a deal breaker, just something that took me momentarily out of the story.

This is another historical fiction work that has highlighted how lacking my historical education has been in many cases. The jacket says this is based on a story that has been lost to history, but it’s not *that* lost, I think. I can find stuff on it with a Google search – the story coming to light again due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

The Winter Station was based on the 1910-1911 plague outbreak in Manchuria. The general outline of events is this: a pneumonic plague that was believed to have originated from a tarbagan marmot infected with bacterial pneumonia jumped to humans who were probably hunting the marmots for their fur. An airborne disease that was also highly contagious, this plague had a near 100% fatality rate and wiped out about 60,000 people over the course of one winter.

This is totally not fair to tarbagan marmots, by the way, because they are freaking *adorable.* They’re like little fat woodchucks who are mostly harmless but who definitely carry pneumonic disease that can spread to humans when the marmots are eaten (especially if the meat is uncooked) or if a flea bites the human after biting an infected marmot (like the plague spread by rats in Europe, but the marmots are WAY cuter).

Marmot - Wikipedia
Look! A tarbagan marmot!

The Manchurian plague was one of the first disease outbreaks that highlighted the need for a multi-national response, foreshadowing international medical groups, like the World Health Organization. Because Japan and Russia had economic interests in Manchuria and the disease was so fatal, the Chinese government requested help from the international community and support from foreign doctors.

At least one of the characters in this book was real. Dr. Wu Lien-teh was a Cambridge trained Malaysian doctor who was called in to assist the situation. He advocated for the use of masks as personal protective equipment, to be worn by doctors, nurses, patients, and when possible, the population at large. The mask he developed was a predecessor of the N-95, popular today as PPE medical providers use to protect themselves from Covid-19. In the book, Dr. Wu faces massive prejudice from certain members of the majority white, European team of doctors, but Dr. Wu turns out to be right, so he get the last laugh, as it were. Baron von Budberg, to his credit, thinks very highly of Dr. Wu in the story.

Dr. Wu probably deserves a book all his own. He may have one that I just haven’t found yet, for all I know. But he practiced medicine until he was 80 and helped develop the first hazmat suit.

Again, The Winter Station was *not* a fast paced thriller but a slow burning medical drama. I greatly enjoyed it, although I didn’t realize how much I was enjoying it until it was nearly over. As long as you know it isn’t a Dan Brown novel going in, there’s no reason why you can’t also enjoy it.

Frenchman’s Creek

I’m sure I’ve mentioned it here before, but Daphne DuMaurier is one of my favorite authors. In spite of this fact, I have not read all her books. This is one of the most recent ones I’ve read.

Frenchman’s Creek takes place during the reign of King Charles II. Dona, Lady of St. Columb and some level of aristocrat, leaves London in a fit of disgust with the society of the time. She retreats to her husband’s country estate in Cornwall, which hasn’t been used in several years. She quickly discovers that it’s being used as a base by the French pirate Jean-Benoit Aubéry, who has a notorious reputation and has been terrorizing the coast near by. She meets him and they begin a love affair.

Dressed as a boy, Dona joins the pirate crew and takes part in one particularly spectacular robbery, which brings her husband and his friend Rockingham to Cornwall. With other men, they plot to capture Aubéry, but Aubéry and his clever crew get the best of the search party – tying them up and robbing them.

I don’t remember exactly what happens but Dona has to kill Rockingham because he attacks her in a jealous rage when he figures out she’s in love with Aubéry. Naturally, Rockingham had his sights on Dona as well, and was a lunatic. Aubéry is eventually captured, but Dona helps him escape, and while she’s tempted to go with him on his ship so they can travel and have adventures together, she ultimately chooses to stay with her children and her husband.

This isn’t du Maurier’s usual style of novel – it’s much more romantic than the other works I’ve read by her, and it wasn’t as dark as other stories, with no horror elements. I did not have an issue with this. du Maurier’s language was as beautiful as ever, and the story was fun.

There an be an argument made that this book was semi-autobiographical. du Maurier struggled with identity during her life. As a girl she wished to be a boy and was a fierce tomboy. She described her sexuality as that of two people – a loving wife and mother, the persona she showed the world, and “a lover” which was she described as an overwhelmingly masculine energy. “The lover” was the force behind her creative work. There was also speculation that she was bisexual (but this is just speculation and has been denied by her children/surviving family). She is also remembered as something as a recluse who got tired of the aristocratic society she belonged to and the general public, but this depends on who you talked to.

With that in mind, it’s possible to see that struggle play out in this work. Dona becomes disgusted with her life and takes a break from it and joins a pirate crew dressed as a boy, while also engaging in a passionate fling with the captain. She is tempted to leave, but ultimately decides that her place is with her husband and children (much like du Maurier stayed with her husband and children, despite that her marriage wasn’t entirely happy.)

I really loved this story for the language, though. It’s an almost dreamy love story with a bit of adventure. It’s quite enjoyable and much more lighthearted than her usual stories, which both shows her depth as an author to jump into almost a different genre of work entirely. It’s not my favorite of her works (I think Rebecca will always be my favorite), but it was good work and I highly recommend it.

A Christmas Carol

I started watching A Christmas Carol with my mom when I was a little girl, and we still watch it every Christmas, although maybe not together. We watch the 1951 version with Alastair Sim as Scrooge. All other versions are wrong/inferior, except for the Muppet version, which is the second best version and also acceptable, because Muppets. That the Alastair Sim version of the film is the best version is one of the pettiest hills I’m willing to die on.

It wasn’t until I was older that I actually read the story. I try to read it most Christmases now, but don’t always succeed. I did in 2018, though. I’m not going to bother recapping it, as it’s a very popular/well known story, but I recommend everyone read it even if they don’t celebrate Christmas, rather than just watch the film. Or listen to the audiobook, that’s fun too., I’ve found that reading Dickens is a joy as long as you aren’t in school. Yes, he is quite wordy, but that is part of what makes it fun. His language is magic all its own.

As with many books gone Hollywood, reading the book is different than the film. I quite enjoyed the book, and it gave me one of my favorite opening lines ever:

Marley was dead: to begin with.

Come on! That’s great!

There are some other really famous lines too, which I love quoting at people who don’t necessarily know what I’m talking about (because I, too, can be a smug asshole). “Are there no prisons!? Are there no workhouses!?”

I also like the end, that Scrooge learns to “keep Christmas in his heart.” The entire thing is beautifully written in a way only Dickens ever seemed to master.

There’s also a lot of history surrounding A Christmas Carol (as there is around a lot of Dickens’ stories) and I find it particularly enjoyable for some reason, possibly because I connect it with the happy Christmases and nostalgia of when I was young, possibly because it’s just very interesting, and possibly just because it’s good. Is there a better story that embodies the spirit of Christmas?

The Victorians more or less developed the celebrations and traditions of modern Christmas. From caroling to Christmas trees, if you’re familiar with it, they developed it or popularized it. Maybe that’s a little broad, but it is generally accurate. The story is considered a zeitgeist of the Victorian age which I heard somewhere but also read on Wikipedia later so maybe that was stolen?

The legacy of the story is one that still touches us today. In the west, we frequently “do” Dickens’ vision of Christmas – we visit friends and family, give to the poor, sing songs, have dances, play games, have a special meal and take a day off from work. We’re more optimistic and more generous than we usually are. We “keep Christmas” the way Dickens’ Scrooge kept Christmas.

I’m sure not everyone loves the story as much as I do, and the actual realities of life at the time clash with the optimism of the story. But I firmly think this is a story that should be read by everyone for the language, lasting legacy, and cultural currency.

This Body’s Not Big Enough For The Both Of Us

So, I’m pretty sure Edgar Cantero is a magician, because there is no way this story should have worked.

The offices of A. Kimrean and Z. Kimrean have one desk. One chair. One phone. A. Kimrean and Z. Kimrean share an office. They share a job. They share a body.

Twins who are ultimately half of a truly functional person – he’s logical, she’s creative, he’s ordered, she’s wild – they work as “Private Eyes” out of a dingy office by Fisherman’s Wharf in San Francisco, and have engaged in a battle for dominance since they were in utero.

A.Z. Kimrean infiltrate the inner circle of a California drug lord to discover who is murdering his sons one by one, and Cantero, with acerbic wit and clever writing, turns every noir and PI trope on its ear. This book is a witty, funny, biting, gender bending adventure about family, embracing being the hero of your own story, and basically being a fucking weirdo.

How the twins function doesn’t really matter. Their psych doctor (who is also like a mom to them) calls them chimeric twins. Adrian is the twin everyone wants on the case, Zooey not so much. Zooey is also a bit of a nymphomaniac and the twins are a hermaphrodite.

As I said, nothing about this story should have worked, and yet, the book was very enjoyable. It was funny, interesting, and incredibly fresh. As someone fairly familiar with the detective genre, it was pretty cool to watch this book subvert it at every turn.

This Body’s Not Big Enough For The Both Of Us is another Edgar Cantero book, so it’s probably not for everyone, but I enjoy Edgar Cantero, and I’m highly recommending it.

Carrie

I read (listened to) Carrie as part of my ongoing effort to get through more of Stephen King’s prolific collection of published works.

Sissy Spacek performed the reading and I liked the touch because she played Carrie in the 1976 film.

Of all the Stephen King books I’ve been through so far, and admittedly, I haven’t been through that many, this was probably my least favorite. All of King’s books can be haunting and jarring and all deal with hints of the supernatural and that kind of thing, and Carrie is no different.

But I disliked it because it made me cringe. Carrie’s naivete is hard to deal with, although I guess without sex-ed and the internet you wouldn’t know what your period was. That said, I think I disliked it more because I hate bullies.

Carrie is bullied. Relentlessly. It’s clearly gone on for years before the the start of events actually chronicled in the story and goes on throughout the novel. For all my short comings (and believe me, there are many) I am not a bully, and reading about how every single kid picks on this girl just drove me crazy.

I get that not every kid is going to stick up for the kid getting bullied. But in my experience, there’s usually at least one. I don’t know where authors go to school (because it’s not just King, there are other authors I’ve read who write about kids being bullied and nobody ever stands up for the kid) but usually someone will stick up for the victim. At least where I lived and grew up. I can’t think of any kid who didn’t have any friends or, at the least, a sympathetic classmate. Carrie kind of gets one in Sue Snell, but Sue’s still a little too wishy washy publicly to make a real difference.

I also spent most of the book wishing I could beat Carrie’s mother to death. Carrie’s mom bullies her too, and I don’t particularly understand her religious views, which are basically entirely related to sex and how evil it is, even when you’re married to someone. She’s one of those people that, upon reflection, make you think that maybe there really isn’t enough to do for young people in certain parts of this country in their formative years. Like many of King’s stories, this one takes place in Maine.

I did like the (fake) scientific articles on telekinesis throughout the story. Something about fake science is a lot of fun for me. It sounds like it could be real.

Anyway, Carrie was a good story, but not my favorite. It’s also obviously one of King’s earlier works, and I enjoyed the references to things like payphones and paying a quarter for a burger and soda. Nostalgia is fun, guys!

The Hobbit

Ah yes, one of my old favorites: JRR Tolkien’s The Hobbit.

I goofed though. It was a full BBC radio production of the book, not a straight reading of the text. The Wikipedia entry on the production says the script remains close to the text, but I didn’t like it. The voice actors of the dwarves annoyed me, Gandalf sounded ridiculously arrogant instead of kindly and gentle, Bilbo had a lisp, I felt like the whole thing was pretty far off from the novel even though the internet swears that isn’t the case.

It was only 4 or 5 hours long too. I don’t know if that would be true in a straight reading of the text. In this case, since I wasn’t much enjoying the production, it’s short length meant less suffering.

I love The Hobbit. I love it. I love Lord of the Rings, I love Tolkien.

I hated this. I know it’s the “classic” radio production. I know, I know, I know. I didn’t enjoy this. I disliked the production so much I could barely focus on the story, which I love.

I’d have preferred a straight reading of the text, or maybe a different production. I came across another “full production” recording of a book this year that I thought was excellent. But this? I couldn’t. I just didn’t like it. Someone must love it. I just don’t. I don’t know how they ruined The Hobbit for me, but they did. Bad job, BBC.

Miss Peregrine’s Home For Peculiar Children, Hollow City & Library of Souls

Miss Peregrine’s Home For Peculiar Children, Hollow City, and Library of Souls are a trilogy of young adult novels written by Ransom Riggs which I thoroughly enjoyed.

I picked Miss Peregrine’s Home For Peculiar Children, the first book in the series, up off the table at Barnes & Noble because of the cover. It was a little girl levitating. And I bought it because of the pictures inside, which were all of children in pictures doing hard to believe things. Some of the pictures were funny, some were creepy, all were in black and white, all were intriguing, and it convinced me to buy the book without really investigating it first.

So when I started it, I had no idea it was a YA book.

People piss all over YA books as if they can’t be enjoyed as adults because they aren’t sophisticated enough, and act as if you are an immature neophyte simpleton if you do enjoy them. While I find a lot of them not so good (paranormal romance isn’t much my thing – romance in general isn’t much my thing), every so often I find a YA book (or series of books) that I really, really enjoy. People are really snobby about this, but I have nothing against YA books, just STUPID YA books. But, to be fair, I’m pretty against ALL stupid books, YA and adult alike.

The premise of Miss Peregrine’s Home For Peculiar Children is that 16 year old Jacob Portman watches his grandfather die, killed by a monster that only he can see. It sends him into kind of a PTSD depression, which is understandable, since after telling his story, everyone thinks he’s crazy. Following a series of clues, some suggestions from his psych doctor, and taking advantage of the fact his parents are desperate for him to recover from his illness, he convinces his father to take him to Wales, where his grandfather had supposedly survived in a children’s home as a Jew during the Holocaust.

Exploring the house, which is now in ruins, Jacob meets and follows a girl who can create fire with her hands and who calls out his grandfather’s name upon seeing him. Jacob is later confused to find that the inn where he and his father were staying is different, as are the town residents. He’s rescued by the girl, named Emma, and a boy, Millard, and finds himself transported to the children’s home of the stories his grandfather told him when he was a kid. The children in the home are all “peculiars” (children with some sort of supernatural/enhanced/strange ability; Emma can create fire, Millard is invisible,  Olive can levitate, etc…) and the headmistress is Miss Alma Peregrine, an Ymbryne (a woman who can transform into a bird and create time loops).

After some investigating, Jacob discovers that his grandfather was also a peculiar, with his  ability being that he can see hollowgasts – monsters that feed on peculiars for their souls. Jacob realizes that he has inherited his grandfather’s gift and that the monster that he saw kill his grandfather was a hollowgast.

The story goes on from there over the course of that book and the other two books.

I loved these books – loved, loved, looooved. They were a fun story with all the things that make a great fantasy story – fun, adventure, epic consequences, quirky characters, friendship, loyalty, and even a dash of romance (fairly well done romance, as far as romance goes).

I also enjoyed the appearance of new characters throughout the series, but not so many it was overwhelming (looking at you, George R.R. Martin). One of my favorite characters was introduced in Library of Souls. Sharon is a boatman who ferries and guides the kids through Devils Acre. I find Sharon very darkly funny and very relatable. The books had a lot of humor in them as well – some of it rather dark, which always appeals to me.

So it’s YA lit but it’s enjoyable for any age. If you want something fun to read with your kids, or just for you, these books are it.